Published by Eric Bogatin on 05 Jul 2008 at 08:08 pm
7/1/08 Smooth copper foils for extra low loss
Last week, I was in Montreal for the IPC Educational Course and Technical Conference and spoke with John Andresakis from Oak-Mitsui. He gave a talk on Copper Foils for High Frequency and Fine Pitch Applications. Though I was not able to attend his talk, I spoke with him after wards and learned about the incredible progress in producing smooth copper foils for low loss interconnects.
It’s easy to estimate the conductor losses in copper traces. It’s based on the line width, the skin depth and the frequency. This topic is covered in detail in our new course, High Speed Design Principles. When the surface roughness of the copper is larger than the skin depth, the series resistance from each surface can be increased by about a factor of 2. In stripline, this means surface roughness can increase series resistance by about 50% from the loss expected with ultra smooth copper traces.
With a typical RMS roughness of about 5 microns, the series resistance of each surface is doubled at frequencies above about 500 MHz. Surface roughness has the effect of increasing the losses of a 5 mil wide line to appear as lossy as a 3.5 mil wide line.
Enter a new generation of ultra smooth copper foil, DFF (dual flat foil). John said that the process Oak-Mitsui developed creates the smooth copper as it is being plated on the drum from the solution. The smoothness arises from careful control of grain size during the plating process. John said DFF copper foil can have a smoother surface on the solution side than on the polished drum side.
The smoother copper foil from Oak Mitsui can’t reduce the copper losses below the theoretical limit, but it can give back the 50% resistance increase lost through roughness. For high speed series links pushing the loss limits, or using low loss lamiantes such as RO4350, this ultra smooth copper has a lot of potential.
Colin Warwick on 24 Jul 2008 at 11:35 am #
Hi Eric, Great article. One question. You say Surface roughness has the effect of increasing the losses of a 5 mil wide line to appear as lossy as a 3.5 mil wide line.
Shoudn’t this be “Surface roughness has the effect of increasing the losses of a 5 mil wide line to appear as lossy as a 2.5 mil wide line.” ? To offset the effect of halving the current depth, you have to double the width.
Colin Warwick on 24 Jul 2008 at 11:44 am #
Inspired by this article, I just upgrade my interactive skin effect page to include the Hammerstad empirical roughness model http://signal-integrity-tips.com/2008/skin-effect-crisis/
Jose on 28 Jul 2008 at 7:15 am #
Hi,
Great article. In my case (test fixtures for test and measurement) any improvement on loss is great news.
On the RO4350 comment, I though RO4350 requires a very special type of rough copper to be used to get the needed adesion. I don’t think we cannot choose what kind of copper is used on RO4350 and I’m not sure if RO4350 can handle a very smooth copper.
Jose
sandrar on 10 Sep 2009 at 9:55 am #
Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog.
Cheers! Sandra. R.
Pavan on 19 Mar 2010 at 6:04 am #
Hi Eric,
Its been really good article but need more thorough explanation towards the topic elsewhere it is really good.
I have gone through the preview edition of your book “SIGNAL INTEGRITY- Simplified”. Its really good explanation there. I wanna purchase it through PRENTICE HALL but they told me that it is not available in India.
Can you help me??
Regards,
Pavan Vora
Design Engineer (AMIE)