Published by Eric Bogatin on 27 Jul 2009 at 06:23 am
7/27/09 Common Sense Signal Integrity Principles: a Baker’s Dozen
Check out our next public classes: Essential Principles of Signal Integrity and Advanced Signal Integrity Design, Oct 11-14 in Hillsboro, OR.
Check out our next No Myths Allowed Webinar, “Stack-up Design for Differential Pairs”, presented free on Sept 16, 1 pm EDT.
The design process is a creative process and intuition is the most important skill you rely on first. Once you have a design, then you apply your analysis skills to evaluate the cost-performance tradeoffs.
Wikipedia defines intuition as the “ability to sense or know immediately without reasoning”. I like to think of intuition as what you take away after you have done the reasoning- what has become ingrained in your understanding and you trust to use every day. It becomes your “common sense” of the right way of doing things.
The better your intuition or common sense about signal integrity, the better your first pass design will be. This translates to a shorter and lower cost design process.
Because signal integrity is sometimes “anti-intuitive”, we sometimes have to “re-calibrate” our intuition for these analog electromagnetic effects important in interconnects. The Essential Principles class I teach, is really about building a strong foundation for your common sense about signal integrity. Here in an abbreviated list, are 13 of the most important principles to strengthen your common sense when dealing with signal integrity:
1. The fastest way of fixing a problem is by first identifying its root cause and then applying the Youngman Principle.
2. All interconnects are transmission lines, no matter how long or how short they are.
3. All signals are dynamic and constantly move along the transmission line at the speed of light in the dielectric, roughly 6 inches/nsec.
4. Signals sees an instantaneous impedance each step they takes along a transmission line.
5. The return current is exactly coincident with the signal current, flowing in the opposite direction, in the return conductor.
6. Reflections occur whenever the instantaneous impedance changes.
7. Don’t confuse the distributed cross talk between transmission lines which rarely extends beyond adjacent lines, with ground bounce cross talk which can extend to many adjacent transmission lines.
8. Ground bounce occurs due to the dI/dt of the return current passing through the total inductance of the return path.
9. The differential impedance of a differential pair can be just as well controlled for a tightly coupled as loosely coupled pair.
10. A real capacitor behaves like a series combination of ideal RLC elements even up to the GHz bandwidth.
11. Always try to place power and ground planes on adjacent layers with thin dielectric between them.
12. Use SPICE to simulate the parallel resonances when multiple capacitors and the power and ground planes are connected in parallel.
13. Assign return path layers and signal routing in the stack up based on the ability to provide a return via whenever a signal via changes layers.
If you want to learn more about common sense signal integrity, take our class, Essential Principles of Signal Integrity, attend one of our webinars or visit our web site, www.beTheSignal.com.
Charlies Sullivan on 27 Jul 2009 at 7:24 am #
That’s a great list. Thanks.
I would caution on #10 that although MLC caps behave as an RLC up to their resonant frequency, and behave as an RLC well above their resonant frequency, they behave quite differently through the transition between those two regimes. And the L and R values are quite different in those two ranges: the actual HF L is as much as 5X lower than the L value corresponding to the resonant frequency. And the R value is much higher above the resonant frequency.
See this paper: http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/inductor/papers/Sullivan_epep_MLC.pdf
Of course, seeing this behavior requires a careful measurement: residual L in the test fixture can swamp the L in the cap. But this behavior can be seen even in some cap manufacturers’ curves.
On another topic, I’m curious about #2 vs. #8: conceptualizing a pair as a transmission line, vs. ground bounce as Ldi/dt. What guidance would you give about when to conceptualize ground bounce using transmission line concepts rather than just Ldi/dt? I guess that breaks down when di/dt at the two ends of the line aren’t the same?
Colin Warwick on 27 Jul 2009 at 8:17 am #
Hi Eric, Thanks! Can you elaborate on #13? I read it several times but couldn’t visualize what the recommendation is. Maybe a diagram comparing a good and bad stackup would help?
Thanks!
Les Embrey on 27 Jul 2009 at 11:51 am #
When routing a high speed critical signal use a much care, step by step, in choosing the adjacent return path; as the return signal will jump to the adjacent layer as the signal changes layers.
» Analogue Electronics – Improving Signal Integrity on 02 Aug 2009 at 7:41 pm #
[...] So for some excellent advice on addressing analogue signal integrity issues check out this post on Analogue Signal Integrity. [...]
Eric Bogatin on 26 Aug 2009 at 1:49 pm #
A comment on Charles Sullivan’s comment: When the mouting inductance is less than about 500 pH, the RLC model for a typical MLCC capacitor breaks down and is not accurate. This is due to the frequency dependent current distribution that flows through some of the plates in the capacitor.
The closer the plates are to the board, the more current flows through them.
However, when the mounting inductance is larger than 500 pH, as is often the case, the RLC model for a capacitor is accurate to 10-20% and is the simplest model to use when simulating the impedance profile.
If your mounting inductance is smaller than 0.5 nH, good for you! you are doing it right and probably are in a position to use a more sophisticated model for the capacitor.
Charlie Sullivan on 27 Sep 2009 at 12:54 pm #
Just a quick confirmation that I agree completely with EB’s comment above in reply to mine.